usr/share/doc/packages/smillaenlarger/gettingStarted.html usr/share/doc/packages/smillaenlarger/dragAndPaste.html usr/share/doc/packages/smillaenlarger/dimensions.html usr/share/doc/packages/smillaenlarger/cropping.html usr/share/doc/packages/smillaenlarger/command.html usr/share/doc/packages/smillaenlarger/changelog.txt usr/share/doc/packages/smillaenlarger/bug.html usr/share/doc/packages/smillaenlarger/batch.html usr/share/doc/packages/smillaenlarger/README.md * %setup -n was changed not to cd everywhere * Fri smillaenlarger-qt5.patch: Very simple patch to allow `spec-cleaner` and general refactoring. * Removed smillaenlarger-qt5.patch & sktop. * Sources were switched to /lupoDharkael/smilla-enlarger. SmillaEnlarger is a small graphical tool ( based on Qt ) to resize,Įspecially magnify bitmaps in high quality. Summary: A graphical tool to resize bitmaps in high quality Group: Productivity/Graphics/Bitmap Editors Smillaenlarger-0.9.0+git.2017.11.21-bp154.1.62 RPM for x86_64 From OpenSuSE Leap 15.4 for x86_64 Name: smillaenlargerĭistribution: SUSE Linux Enterprise 15 SP4 It is the final print output that matters if print is the final destination - so it can be hard to evaluate things on the screen when comparing different methods or software.Smillaenlarger-0.9.0+git.2017.11.21-bp154.1.62.x86_64 RPM Index Some images may need noise reduction or JPEG compression cleaning before resizing. Some resize methods and image content may work better with images with no sharpening applied before the resize, while others may not. The software mentioned above has the built-in option to add some noise to the resized image. Other times one wishes a clean, clinical resize. Sometimes adding some " smart noise" to an image can help it look more "organic" and not so "clinical". Sometimes one may blend two different enlargement methods together using opacity or perhaps layer mask elements from one resize method into another. I personally have liked the results from the free "SmillaEnlarger" -Īs Sam mentions above, results from any resizing software will depend on the source image content and the software settings. If the uprezzing is for canvas prints, you will not be able to discern any difference in details, due to to the nature of canvas surfaces and their effect on very fine image detail. My GF 6 was originally GF5 and I do not plan on any further upgrades, as LR3 does a fine job also, and is much, much faster. Now there are so many bells and whistles for each software ( especially GF6/7 ) that the difference may relate more to the sliders settings for each, than the basic underlying software. And it may be that this difference is image specific some images may render better in one, and some images render better in the other. I find it is basically a trade off between speed of the two modes, and LR3 is much much faster on my 4 year old MacPro. I doubt anyone would notice unless the prints were directly compared side by side. I do not want to argue with Andrew, but several images that I have uprezzed in CS5 and GF6, looked slightly more detailed via GF6 on a direct side by side comparison. Andrew, Can't one uprez in Genuine Fractals/Perfect Resize and then capture sharpen upon printing in Lightroom3?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |